The $130,000 payment was reportedly made shortly before the election. Mr. Trump “vehemently denies” the encounter happened, his lawyer said.
Tag Archives: WorldNews
Trump’s words
| Newspaper cover this morning |
President Trump’s use of the term “shithole” to describe El Salvador along with Haiti and African nations was immediately and widely reported in El Salvador.
El Salvador’s government issued a statement lamenting the expressions and demanding respect for the “noble and valiant” Salvadoran people and reminding the White House that Salvadorans had helped rebuild the Pentagon after 9-11 and had helped rebuild New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina.
Estados Unidos valora la amistad y la relación con el pueblo Salvadoreño. He tenido el privilegio de viajar alrededor de este hermoso país y conocer a miles de Salvadoreños. Es un honor vivir y trabajar aquí. Seguiremos 100% comprometidos.— Jean Manes (@USAmbSV) January 12, 2018
The United State values the friendship and the relationship with the Salvadoran people. I have had the privilege to travel around this beautiful country and to meet thousands of Salvadorans. It is an honor to live and work here. We will continue to be 100% committed.
.@realDonaldTrump called El Salvador a shithole country. My parents fled that country because of U.S.-intervention. If it’s a shithole, it’s Made in the USA™.— Daniel Alvarenga (@_danalvarenga) January 11, 2018
ARENA candidate for president in 2019 Carlos Calleja tweeted:
Debemos sentirnos orgullosos de ser salvadoreños. Cada ofensa, venga de donde venga, debe fortalecernos y unificarnos como nación. Nuestra relación de respeto con el pueblo norteamericano seguirá siendo una realidad hoy, mañana y siempre. #ElSalvadorCachimbón— Carlos Calleja (@jccalleja) January 11, 2018
We should feel proud to be Salvadorans. Each offense, come from wherever they come, must strengthen and unify us as a nation. Our relationship of respect with the American people will remain a reality today, tomorrow and always. #ElSalvadorCachimbón
The UN High Commissioner on Human Rights who recently visited El Salvador and was certainly critical of the country’s human rights record, reacted harshly:
A spokesman for the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner on Human Rights condemned President Trump for calling Haiti, El Salvador and African nations “shithole countries,” saying “there’s no other word one can use but racist” to describe the remarks.
In the end, I do not expect these remarks to change anything in the relationship between the US and El Salvador. I do think that the words of Trump express accurately how he views the countries of the developing world, and particularly developing countries in Latin America. It is one of the reasons that I predicted two days after Trump’s election that there was a serious question whether TPS would ever be renewed for El Salvador. If you gave this “actual genius” a test regarding facts concerning El Salvador, I expect the only thing he could tell you is that MS-13 has gang members in the country.
US ambassador to Panama quits and says he cannot serve under Trump
- John Feeley writes letter of resignation and will quit on 9 March
- Feeley says he signed an oath to ‘serve faithfully’ but can no longer do so
The US ambassador to Panama has resigned, telling the US state department he no longer feels able to serve Donald Trump.
Related: Donald Trump denies using the phrase ‘shithole countries’ in immigration talks
New Der SPIEGEL Cover explained: The Age of Fire and Fury
Humanity as a whole is being set back just because of one single Person. Where is the world supposed to start again if it manages to survive Donald Trump?
India’s Supreme Court judges warn democracy is in danger
In a stunning move, four of the senior most judges of India’s Supreme Court have publicly slammed the functioning of the country’s top court and warned that democracy will not survive without an independent judiciary.
Norwegians decline President Donald Trump’s offer to move to US
grin
Norwegians have been quick to decline the offer from Donald Trump to move to the US. The president had said in less than polite terms that they would be more welcome than migrants from other American or African states.
Making Journalism Great Again
Image courtesy DW
OXFORD – In the debate over the future of journalism, “fake news” has taken center stage, with storylines featuring a ranting American president, Russian communication “bots,” and betrayal and subterfuge competing for public attention. But in an era of diminishing profits and shrinking audiences, is fake news really the biggest threat that traditional media face?
In a news environment increasingly prone to hyperventilation, it can be difficult to separate fact from fabricated or deliberately skewed content shared via social media. The proliferation of “bots” – computer programs that automatically spread disinformation – has blurred these lines further. And as the methods of manipulation multiply, the problem is only likely to worsen.
And yet the near-constant focus on fake news has distracted many in the industry from more serious challenges confronting professional journalism. The erosion of business models and growing dependence on third-party digital distributors – like Facebook and Google – have handcuffed news organizations and cut deeply into their profits. Worse, audiences no longer trust the information presented to them. This suggests that the problem is bigger than fake news.
In fact, large, traditional, or legacy media organizations still trump social media as trusted sources. As the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism’s Digital News Report 2017 revealed, 40% of news consumers say that established media organizations – The New York Times, for example – accurately differentiate fact from fiction. For social media, this share is only 24%.
But this also means that 60% of news consumers regard the legacy media as being careless with facts. That statistic alone should be a cause for grave concern to everyone in the industry.
According to the report – which surveyed some 70,000 Internet users in 36 countries – 29% of respondents said they were avoiding news altogether. For many, this was either because producers’ preference for negative stories put them in a bad mood, or because they viewed the reporting as politically slanted and therefore untrustworthy.
Without trust, there is no audience; and without an audience, there is no business. If the survey’s results are representative of broader trends, one of the world’s most important pillars of democracy – a free and open press – is in jeopardy.
Perhaps this should come as no surprise. In the digital era, trust deficits have affected most major institutions, from political parties and big companies to religious organizations and universities. This could be a sign of a more informed and critical citizenry; or, more likely, it could be a response to feeling overwhelmed by choice and powerless in a complex world.
But what has changed for news organizations is that, thanks to social media, they no longer have a monopoly on holding the powerful to account. On the contrary, they have come to be identified with the powerful – part of a media-business-political elite divorced from the concerns of ordinary people. Having become a target of popular anger, journalism will need to “disrupt” itself to regain credibility and restore audiences’ trust.
To this end, media organizations should take at least six steps. For starters, news outlets must set their own agendas, rather than wasting resources on pursuing someone else’s. The international investigation that led to the Panama Papers and the Paradise Papers are brilliant examples of journalism that is relevant and interesting – two fundamental criteria that all reporting should meet.
Second, reporters have a responsibility to their audiences to analyze what powerful actors are doing, rather than what they are saying. As the Washington Post’s media columnist Margaret Sullivan recently observed, coverage of US President Donald Trump has focused narrowly on his words, at the expense of his policy.
Third, the media must become better listeners. Journalists’ distinction between “reporting” and “reporting on the ground” highlights the reality that a sizable proportion of newsroom staff never leave their desks. Journalists don’t necessarily do this by choice; many are glued to their screens because their companies lack resources, or force them to follow and report on twitter feeds. In a sense, reporters’ behavior is merely a symptom of an editorial pathology.
Fourth, news organizations must engage audiences – talking to them, not down to them. Very often, the news cycle is driven by assumptions about what viewers or readers might like, rather than what they actually want. Diversity in a newsroom is vital to broadening the relevance of its coverage.
Fifth, in the rush to experiment with new forms of storytelling, some media companies are forgetting their mission. News outlets should forego expensive, flashy projects if they do little to further audiences’ understanding of a story.
Finally, rebuilding trust will require a new definition of news itself. When audiences feel overwhelmed by information and complexity, the response can be to tune out. The media must give people a reason to tune back in. (One example: positive news is dramatically undervalued in today’s media environment.)
If traditional media outlets allow themselves to be defined by the fake-news debate, they, too, will be overwhelmed. So long as social media companies optimize for advertising revenue, their algorithms will tend to reward the extremes, and news organizations will waste valuable resources battling disinformation.
A better approach would be to make news less boring. Reputable media companies have always sought to capitalize on facts: the scoop, the exclusive interview, the probing investigation. Truth, like trust, is a commodity. The future of the industry depends on getting better at producing it.
Alexandra Borchardt is Director of Strategic Development at the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2017.
‘The New Normal’ in Pakistan: a Journalist on the Run From Gunmen
Taha Siddiqui, a reporter and frequent critic of Pakistan’s military, escaped an attack by a dozen men who diverted his car just outside the capital.
Op-Ed Contributor: Maybe Trump Is Not Mentally Ill. Maybe He’s Just a Jerk.
Without proper neuropsychological testing of the president, we can’t know if he has a mental disorder or is a narcissistic bully.
Op-Ed Columnist: Dollars, Cents and Republican Sadism
well said Republican attacks on the safety net are about inflicting pain, not saving money.
You must be logged in to post a comment.