All posts by nedhamson

Activist, writer, researcher, addicted to sharing information and facts.

Facebook helped foment anti-Muslim violence in Sri Lanka. What now? | Amalini De Sayrah

5760.jpg?w=300&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&f

For many Sri Lankans, Facebook is the internet, but while the social media platform has belatedly taken action on hate speech wider society must also take responsibility

“Kill all Muslims, do not spare even an infant, they are dogs,” a Facebook status, white Sinhalese text against a fuchsia background, screamed on 7 March 2018. Six days later – after hundreds of Muslim families had watched their homes ransacked and their businesses set on fire – it was allowed to remain online, despite being reported for violating the company’s community standards.

Facebook’s role in the anti-Muslim violence in Sri Lanka this March cannot be overstated. Posts spreading blatant misinformation about the community, inciting hate and violence, remained online for days after they were reported. This was one reason why the Sri Lankan government banned Facebook in March.

Continue reading…

‘Knives, knives, knives’: Trump fuels fear of London knife crime at NRA event

Why does the clown hate London so much?

5568.jpg?w=300&q=55&auto=format&usm=12&f

Trump called an unnamed London hospital that allegedly had blood everywhere a ‘war zone’ when defending gun ownership

Donald Trump on Friday fuelled fears of a knife crime epidemic in London by comparing a hospital in the city to “a war zone”, with blood all over the floors.

The US president, addressing the National Rifle Association (NRA) convention in Dallas, made the inflammatory comments two months before he is due to make his first visit to the UK.

Continue reading…

مجلس روابط الوطني الفلسطيني وبطولات أشبال غزة The National Council of Villages and the heroic acts of Gazan Youth

نادية حرحش

ِEnglish Follows

فكرت لوهلة بعدم استخدام كلمة فلسطين أو وطن، في عنوان يمثل من يقودون قضية الى أن تصبح قصية. ولكن عدت أدراجي وفكرت بعناوين التهليل لذاك المجلس، لعروبة القدس وفلسطينيتها، ولتحرير الأرض، وعن حق المقاومة ( على غرار ازرع تفاح)، وعن انتخاب (تزكية) أسماء أمراء القبائل (كلمة قبيلة تبدو كبيرة وتفخيمية)، وتحيا فلسطين، والعودة، ولن نركع، والجماهير العربية بملايينها، والضمير العربي المستطل (فجرعة التسطيل سطلت ما كان حتى مستتر).

انتهت مهزلة المجلس المنعقد بعد أكثر من عقدين ، ليجدد الكهول جرعة الحياة في أنابيب التنفس، مستمرين في محاولة الاختلال الكوني لاحتلال ما تبقى من خيال أمام المشاهدين من شهاد الزور على مقاعد المسرح وخلف الشاشات لسراب بشري ستأكله رياح الصحراء وتنهيه الى حبات رمل عبثية.

قبيلة “البؤساء” استمتعت بعروض فانتازيا تاريخية ومهزلة إنسانية وتسعير رخيص يشد النخوة في كرسي يحمل منصب.

الرئيس المجدد (مع فتحة فوق الشدة) أنعم على الرعية في الشق الآخر من الوهن (كلمة وطن لم تعد…

View original post 1,699 more words

Theresa May’s Conservatives beat expectations in England elections

The “row” has served its purpose for now – to weaken Labour Left and gain Tory unconditional support for the right in Israel?

19397439_303.jpg

An anti-Semitism row plaguing the opposition Labour Party has dented their hopes for widespread gains. Meanwhile, the pro-Brexit UKIP has all but disappeared from local councils across England.

EU bans neonics; U.S. bees not so lucky

Bee buzzing



After years of strong scientific evidence and even stronger advocacy, this week European officials decided to make a temporary ban on three bee-harming pesticides permanent. This is very, very good news for bees in Europe.

The decision reflects years of hard work by our PAN partners and many others. It also spotlights just how far behind we are in the U.S. — not only with our pollinator protection efforts, but in how we regulate pesticides overall.

U.S. pollinators not so lucky

A few years ago, national momentum to protect honeybees and other pollinators from pesticides seemed to be building here in the U.S. A high-profile White House Pollinator Health Task Force officially recognized the importance and urgency of problem, and promised a comprehensive action plan.

Not surprisingly, the effort attracted the attention of pesticide industry lobbyists, and the Task Force ended up punting any meaningful action to the states.

The science on the harms neonicotinoid pesticides (aka “neonics”) cause to honey bees and other pollinators continued to mount, as did evidence that neonics provided little actual benefit to farmers. Yet states have by and large failed to step up to the plate. Pressure from pesticide manufacturers appears to have played a role here as well. Seeing a pattern here anyone?

State action stymied too

Minnesota provides a telling example. In the face of mounting scientific evidence and strong public concern about bee-harming pesticides, the state Department of Agriculture conducted a Neonic Review — and in 2016 released a strong set of recommended actions to protect pollinators in the state.

Governor Dayton then signed an executive order setting the changes in motion, and establishing a “Committee on Pollinator Protection” to track implementation and recommend what else could be done. PAN and our partners in the state celebrated these groundbreaking commitments, and held up Minnesota as an example for others to follow.

Then came the pushback.

In last year’s legislative session, lawmakers did all they could to undermine pollinator protection measures and state pesticide rules. While PAN and our partners were able to hold the line against the most egregious rollbacks, legislators were clearly keen to weaken pollinator protections in the state — just as industry lobbyings were pressing them to do. 

What do they have that we don’t?

So how is it that the entire European Union can agree to take the top three bee-harming pesticides off the market, but it’s so difficult to get even minimal protections in place here in the U.S.? While there’s certainly no simple answer to this question, I’d point to a few key facts.

First, European regulators seem to actually be aware that the pesticide industry has a vested interest in keeping their products on the market. Somehow officials here in the U.S. seem to have missed this — or don’t think it matters — and give the interests of industry “stakeholders” the same (or more) weight than those advocating for the public good.

Second, scientific evidence has more influence on policy making in the EU. While it still takes advocacy to make this happen (as our PAN UK and PAN EU partners know well), the value placed on independent science stands in stark contrast to the increasingly post-truth, politicized rulemaking process here across the pond.

EPA process rewards delay

And finally, Europe takes less of an “innocent until proven guilty” approach to pesticides. When evidence shows a product may be causing harm, it’s quickly taken off the market until manufacturers can prove otherwise, in the interest of public and/or environmental health.

Hence the moratorium on neonic use that was put in place three years ago, and made permanent this week.

In the U.S., a pesticide can be flagged as a “chemical of concern” and stay on the market for years — even decades — while manufactures pay their scientists to (slowly) make the case that their products are safe. Every additional season on the market means one more year of profit; incentives are strong to drag out the process as far as possible.

Avoiding the treadmill

Whether here or in Europe, one of our top objectives at PAN is dismantling the pesticide treadmill, or as our colleagues in the UK call it, the

pesticide merry-go-round, whereby chemicals banned because of their environmental and health impacts are simply replaced by similarly toxic alternatives

We strongly support the efforts of our colleagues in the UK and Europe to ensure the neonics that were recently banned are not replaced by “similarly toxic alternatives.” Let’s support practices that benefit farmers, rural communities and the environment instead.

Share this post: