I question the rationale for the writing of and printing of this week’s NY Times Magazine article,
A New Climate Reality Is Coming Into
View by David Wallace-Wells
The effect of the article, days before the election and with new troublesome issues being brought to light every week, let’s face it: what do you think the impact is? If the author and magazine editor really thought there was a real danger in climate change, would/could they have written/published such an article? And at this time?
I am tired and will not review all the news about continuing or escalating environmental practices by the giant corporations. There appears to be some widespread but meager meaningful initial response to the problem, but certainly not sufficient to warrant or justify such a reassuring widespread article. No Catastrophe in sight? I pray its publication does not reflect any…
View original post 377 more words