This State Could Police Your Sex Positions If Roe v. Wade Is Overturned

“If nothing is protected by the United States Constitution, and everything is a state’s right,” Nessel said, “it’s going to matter a whole hell of a lot who your Attorney General is because of how these laws are gonna be enforced, and then more so than that, who your state legislators and who your governor are, because we’ve got to repeal these laws.”

Nessel noted that conservatives—including the Republicans angling for her job—often frame abortion and birth control precedents as examples of judicial overreach when they should be rights determined by states. It’s a framing that sounds nice to the average person on the surface, but obscures the truth at hand.

“To them, it’s like, ‘yeah, I want my state to have rights.’ But what it means is that someone is voting on your rights—that you don’t automatically have those rights as an American by virtue of the fact that you live in a nation that values your right to privacy and believes that government has no place in your bedroom,” Nessel said. “People ought to be very concerned about that.”

Source: This State Could Police Your Sex Positions If Roe v. Wade Is Overturned

2 thoughts on “This State Could Police Your Sex Positions If Roe v. Wade Is Overturned”

  1. How on earth would they inforce that anyway, with cameras in all bedrooms? Don’t they have more immediate problems to debate about than sex practices? Sounds a bit obsessive to me. Are people in Michigan very religious? I mean in the fundamentalistic way?

    Liked by 1 person

    1. All our states used to have such laws – which were applied selectively to persecute “enemies.” We have in this country known trends of “fundamentalism” that sweep the country every 20-30 years. Other nations too, I think.

      Like

Comments are closed.